Society Watch

…watching over you!

France Extends Detention Of Telegram Chief, Pavel Durov

2 min read

French authorities have extended the detention of Telegram’s CEO and founder, Pavel Durov, following his arrest at Le Bourget airport, near Paris on Saturday evening.

 

The Russian-born tech mogul was apprehended under a warrant related to alleged offences connected to the widely used but controversial messaging app, Telegram.

Durov, 39, was initially detained after arriving in Paris from Baku, Azerbaijan, with plans to dine in the French capital.

He was accompanied by a bodyguard and a personal assistant at the time of his arrest.

READ ALSO: Resident Doctors Begin Warning Strike

According to sources close to the investigation, Durov’s detention has been extended beyond Sunday night by the investigating magistrate handling the case.

Under French law, this initial period of detention for questioning can last up to 96 hours, after which the judge may either release Durov or press charges and remand him in further custody.

The arrest is the latest development in Durov’s high-profile career, marked by his creation of one of the world’s most influential messaging platforms.

 

France’s OFMIN, an office dedicated to preventing violence against minors, issued the arrest warrant as part of a preliminary investigation into alleged offences, including fraud, drug trafficking, cyberbullying, organized crime, and the promotion of terrorism.

Durov is accused of failing to take sufficient action to curb the criminal use of Telegram.

In response to the arrest, Russia has accused France of “refusing to cooperate,” while fellow tech entrepreneur Elon Musk has come to Durov’s defense.

Durov, who holds a French passport along with other nationalities, has maintained his innocence.

 

A spokesperson for Telegram stated, “Durov has nothing to hide and travels frequently in Europe.

 

He said that Telegram abides by EU laws, “including the Digital Services Act — its moderation is within industry standards. It is absurd to claim that a platform or its owner are responsible for abuse of that platform.”